2 thoughts on “Poetry Discussion: Kubla Khan

  1. If you’ve read Kubla Khan hundreds of times I’d be eager to hear some of your thoughts. It obviously must touch some fiber somewhere that pulls but doesn’t snap.

    Having read it, generously estimated, maybe a dozen or more times, I’m mostly brought back for its and by its brilliantly ringing aural intensity. Sometimes that’s enough in a poem. Sometimes, but not often. Or maybe just not often enough. My intellect needs its hit too. And even in the most abstract language poems there’s usually a flight of fancy in the sounds that carries my thoughts to places unbound from the raw sounds of the language. Otherwise, and why not, just listen to the sounds of the world around us, its cacophonies, euphonies and rhythms. I do.

    But Kubla Khan is not a language poem. Even primal and ur. I don’t think a poet, even an established and celebrated poet, could go there in that day. No, nor do I think it’s mere description. A word painting from a dream built on the detritus and residue of the book he was reading as he nodded from his anodyne? A basis, a foundation of that, yes, but then a metaphor and a springboard into more.

    What more? Something with more contour than a moor. Broadly speaking, the act of creation. Coleridge has a dream. In his dream is created a reality. Of sorts. Waking, he seeks to re-create the ethereal creation of his dream. In creating the fiction that is his poem which seeks to re-create the imaginative creation of his dream, he spirals into the landscape of his own making and then pulls the camera back to reveal himself as the agent in the act of creation.

    Either that or it’s a about sex. Which is an act of creation. Or recreation. And best with a heavy dose of imagination. Yeah, sex, that’ll usually bring me back for another read.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *